Plains Tribune
Value for Value

Making the Invisible Visible

Recording RF in the Black Hills

John Dale - September 18, 2024
Graph showing RF levels over a 5min with a high spike.

List of things for which we have safety standards and public safety tests:

  • Baby binkies
  • Silverware
  • Suspenders
  • Bicycle pedals
  • Backpacks
  • Millions of other products

Wireless is invisible, but it's still there and can heat human tissue. It's an amazing technology, but its wide application threatens the safety of the people who live on planet Earth. So, what's the rush? Why must we roll this technology out now? Are we keeping us safe to death?

The danger of wireless energy from cell phones, cars, light poles, toasters, computers, and other devices is that it can cause Oxidative Stress, which affects the ability of the body to up-take key micronutrients, which makes humans more susceptible to diseases of all kinds including Cancer.

The current safety standard, based on technology that has long since been discontinued (2G, 3G), looks for the radiation emitted by cell phones to go past a certain level of exposure, but the standard is not complete. Meanwhile, the technology is going full steam ahead in schools, in the home, at work, and on the roads according to our research.

Right now, it's measured in the amount of radiation that can be detected in a square meter (or square centimeter).

If it goes above a certain level, the current safety standard says it's harmful. It it doesn't go above that level, it's considered harmless.

There is no in between right now, and more research is required (at least as much safety research as is put into baby buggies and pencil lead).

It's like if the rules of baseball were such that only home runs counted for points, when small ball adds up to more points in the long-run. That's how we're treating wireless energy exposure, like there is no in between. The current standard assumes you're either perfectly safe, or walking dead.

It's like saying that jabs don't matter in boxing, only a haymaker counts.

Currently good and honest researchers are investigating a new standards, but the wireless industry uses its money to create sham research and cast doubt on anyone questioning the safety of cell phones and cell phone towers. It's a pretty dubious behavior coming from the wireless industry, who stands to make trillions from the investments.

In the meantime, sadly, municipalities have put their citizens and visiting tourists at risk of damage from the Oxidative Stress from overexposure to radioactive wireless energy.

But how much energy is absorbed? Recently I found-out when I took one of the most amazing motorcycle rides in the world (again). I started in Spearfish, rode up the Canyon through Lead and Deadwood, South Dakota. Then, down the hill through the spectacular Boulder Canyon on Highway 14A. Then, down through Sturgis, past the VA and Buffalo Chip, then out past Bear Butte to Nisland (WWII Pickle capitol of the world), and back through Belle Fourch, where my mom was born.

We're still analyzing the data set. According to my GQ390 RF safety meter, I was hit with a significant dose of radiation in Sturgis between the VFW and the VA. In the attached image, we drew a red line where my RF safety meter triggers an alert. According to my safety meter, my safety was compromised for over five minutes on this stretch of road in Sturgis.

I pulled into the VFW parking lot for a moment to mark the time at 8:02PM, turned right, and followed the highway through the small canyon by the soccer fields, heeding the speed limit, then past the VA Hospital up toward the Buffalo Chip. That stretch was the most dangerous portion of the ride. My phone was in airplane mode for the entire trip.

Our team is helping define a new standard for exposure to these dangerous and invisible emissions. Until we're finished, we recommend limiting your exposure to wireless radiation by using Ethernet cables, especially when watching movies, and putting your phones in airplane mode when they are not being used.

mapped route from Sturgis VFW to 79 turn off